Files
CapaKraken/docs/audience-scoping-backlog.md
T

99 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown

# Audience Scoping Backlog
**Date:** 2026-03-30
**Purpose:** Collect the remaining audience-scoping work into a single batch backlog so the small auth-hardening slices can be finished before broader architecture work starts.
## Status Snapshot
### Done
- `blueprint.listSummaries`: narrowed to `planning-read`
- `blueprint.getGlobalFieldDefs`: narrowed to `planning-read` with explicit auth coverage
- `entitlement.getBalance`, `entitlement.getBalanceDetail`: narrowed to self-service with elevated cross-resource access for controller, manager, and admin
- `vacation.previewRequest`: now enforces owned-resource access for normal users
- `holidayCalendar.resolveResourceHolidays`, `holidayCalendar.resolveResourceHolidaysDetail`: now enforce self-service ownership with elevated manager/admin reads
- `assistant.listPendingApprovals`: documented and covered as self-service
- `assistant.chat`: documented as an authenticated shell with tool-level audience enforcement
- `resource.chapters`: documented and covered as authenticated safe lookup
- `resource.importSkillMatrix`: documented as self-service and auth-verified
- `project.isImageGenConfigured`, `project.isDalleConfigured`: covered as authenticated low-risk configuration checks
- `notification` self-service and manager boundaries: auth-covered across list, unread counts, reminders, deletes, broadcasts, task creation, and assignment boundaries
### Dirty Files To Avoid Mixing Into This Batch
- `packages/api/src/router/assistant-tools.ts`
- `packages/api/src/__tests__/assistant-tools-advanced.test.ts`
- `packages/api/src/router/notification.ts`
- `packages/api/src/__tests__/assistant-tools-import-export.test.ts`
- `packages/api/src/__tests__/notification-router.test.ts`
These files already have unrelated local edits. Audience parity work that would normally touch them should be deferred or handled through adjacent files and dedicated follow-up tests.
## Remaining Categories
### Completed In This Batch
- `packages/api/src/router/blueprint.ts` -> `getGlobalFieldDefs`
- `packages/api/src/router/assistant.ts` -> `listPendingApprovals`
- `packages/api/src/router/assistant.ts` -> `chat` matrix clarification
- `packages/api/src/router/resource.ts` -> `chapters`
- `packages/api/src/router/resource.ts` -> `importSkillMatrix`
- `packages/api/src/router/project.ts` -> `isImageGenConfigured`, `isDalleConfigured`
### No Further Small Slices Currently Ready
- the previously identified small hardening and tests/docs candidates have been completed, including the notification auth follow-up
- the remaining audience work is now either architectural (`comment.ts`) or blocked by dirty files owned elsewhere
### Needs Architecture Or Policy Design
These routes should not be batch-edited as “small safe slices” until a visibility model exists.
#### `packages/api/src/router/comment.ts`
- Current state: all core routes are `protectedProcedure`
- Why this is not a small slice:
- reads and writes are keyed by generic `entityType` and `entityId`
- visibility depends on the backing entity, not on the comment record alone
- the current author/admin checks for resolve/delete are not enough to decide who may list or create comments on each entity class
- Design work needed:
- define which entity types can host comments
- map each entity type to its audience source of truth
- centralize entity visibility checks before any comment read/write
- Recommended path:
- treat comments as a separate architecture ticket, not part of the quick hardening batch
### Blocked By Dirty Files
#### `packages/api/src/router/assistant-tools.ts`
- Why blocked:
- unrelated local edits are already present
- tool gating changes would mix poorly with concurrent work
- Interim rule:
- keep parity changes on the `assistant.ts` side where possible
- defer tool-level cleanups until the file is stable
## Recommended Next Order
1. `comment` architecture design ticket
2. assistant-tools parity cleanup once the dirty files are free again
## Slice Definition
Each “ready now” slice should follow the same template:
1. change the router audience only if the current procedure is too broad
2. add focused auth tests for unauthenticated, plain authenticated, and elevated callers as applicable
3. update [route-access-matrix.md](/home/hartmut/Documents/Copilot/capakraken/docs/route-access-matrix.md)
4. verify with targeted `vitest`
5. run `git diff --check`
6. commit in isolation
## Exit Criteria For This Batch
- every route in this document is classified as either `done`, `ready now`, `tests/docs only`, `needs architecture`, or `blocked`
- every formerly `ready now` route now has router-level authorization coverage or explicit low-risk documentation
- the access matrix documents all low-risk exceptions explicitly
- larger architecture work starts only after this batch is either completed or intentionally deferred